Why IVC Filter Lawsuits Are Surfacing?

The Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) filters were one of the biggest medical innovations meant to keep out the blood clots from traveling to the internal organs. Unfortunately, these implants have a very unstable design that can fracture, migrate, or puncture the internal organs. It could result in the death of the patient or other non-fatal consequences.

There have been cases where the victims of these implants have filed lawsuits against the manufacturers for deliberately endangering their (patient’s) lives. The IVC filter lawsuit settlements have reached up to $3.6 million depending on the injury of the patient, and the number of damages caused by the product.

Why lawsuits against manufacturers? 

The IVC filters are usually used among the patients at risk of developing severe complications with the blood thinners or anticoagulant medications. However, though research regarding the IVC Filter has shown that the recipient might suffer from pulmonary embolisms or deep vein thrombosis. Ironically, the device was primarily implanted into the subjects to avoid these specific conditions in the first place. 

The surprisingly high amount of reported complications associated with these devices includes:

• A detachment of device components

• Device migration

• Filter fracture

• Filter perforated vein or organ

Later on, retrieval models of the implant were developed for bringing down the complications of the arising from the IVC filters. However, in several instances these retrievals filter failed due to the following reasons:

• A blood clot was stuck inside the filter     

• Filter’s position was not suited for extraction

• Filter was stuck to the inferior vena cava

According to several IVC Filter lawsuits, the manufacturers were aware of the complications associated with these products. Pharmaceuticals like Cook Medical and C.R. Bard were negligent about the inherent flaws of the product and refused to pull the product out of the market. This resulted in numerous non-fatal injuries and deaths.

Have you or your loved ones suffered due to an IVC Filter? Then, you might be eligible for compensation and IVC filter lawsuit settlements. Connect with the team of legal experts from IVC Filter Litigation and know your legal options. For more information, visit https://ivcfilterlitigation.info/ or call (855)-815-0586. 

Settlements In Defective IVC Filter

Interior Vena Cava (IVC) filters are small, cage-like medical devices used for the treatment of patients who suffer from pulmonary embolism (PE). Retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters were introduced to help patients from enduring long term complications of permanent filters. Unfortunately, since their introduction in 2000, the blood clot filters have been linked with plenty of severe health complications.

IVC filters can migrate from the implanted position to other parts of the body through the blood stream. If not treated timely, it can lead to retroperitoneal hematoma, sepsis, gastrointestinal bleeding and air embolism. Patients who suffered from these complications claimed for damage awards in ivc filter lawsuit settlements.

The FDA first released a public safety communication in 2010, followed by another in 2014. Both these health alerts warned about further adverse health events associated with long-term IVC filter use. The FDA announced a recall of all Cordis retrievable IVC filters in 2013. In 2015, C.R. Bard came under fire after the FDA did an investigation to find out its defectively designed devices.

The main complications reported in the lawsuits, include but not limited to:

• Filter fracture
• Perforation of the nerve walls or organs
• Embolization
• Blood clot filter migration
• Difficulty removing the filter

 IVC Filter Lawsuit

A panel on multidistrict litigation (MDL) decided that it would be appropriate to consolidate the IVC filter lawsuits and have been done so in courts in Indiana (Cook) and Arizona (C.R. Bard). As the cases go for trial, it is up to the manufacturer to satisfy the safety concerns.

Following are the main points of argument in the ivc filter lawsuit settlements:

• Inbuilt fault in the medical device's design
• Failed to warn the physicians or the patients about the risk associated
• Misleading representation of the product through wrongful advertisement

Patients, who have suffered from the complications of the defective IVC filters, should file for the lawsuit.

Visit http://ivcfilterlitigation.info/ or dial 1 (855) 631-1338 to know more about how they can help filing the lawsuit. Get a free and legal consultation of your case from the experts.

Three Complications Argued In IVC Filter Settlements

IVC filters are placed into the inferior vena cava (IVC) to prevent blood clot. It is the main blood vessel transporting blood from the lower half of the body to the heart. For patients with the risk of developing blood clots, these devices were said to be an effective alternative to the blood thinning medications. It helps to avert a condition called pulmonary embolism where the formed blood clots move into the lungs. It can also give rise to a serious condition called deep vein thrombosis.
 
The FDA received hundreds of complaints stating the negative effects of IVC filter. The patients then went on to file IVC filter lawsuit settlemets claiming they have suffered serious health injuries post the IVC filter insertion.

 Three of the main complications associated with the IVC filters include but not limited to:

• Embolization: This refers to the IVC filter migration. The filters are flexible devices which when defectively designed might detach themselves from the particular place and break into pieces. These pieces travel upstream blood and settle in different parts of the body causing health complications.
• Perforation: While traveling through the blood, the struts, being metallic in nature causes perforation to the organ walls or might damage the nerve which can lead to internal bleeding.
• IVC Filter Thrombosis: when defective devices are used, a subform of DVT i.e blood clots may be formed within the filters. This is shown through pulmonary embolism, lower back pain, painful inflammation.

The IVC filter lawsuit settlements accuse the device makers of concealing the linked complexities of the filters. They did not mention the chance of filter fracture which can cause organ or nerve damage. Moreover, they did not stop branding their product as a safe medical device even after there were several reports regarding the severe health complications. The plaintiffs can demand for the expenses of the ongoing and future medical bills. If qualified, the patients can even get the expenses for the wage loss, hospitalization costs, reduced earning capacity and funeral expenses and punitive damages.

You might be entitled for a financial compensation if you have suffered from the complications of IVC filter implant. To understand about the lawsuits, the proceedings and how can you be eligible to get the damage awards, get in touch with the expert team of ivcfilterlitigation.info.