Five Reported Greenfield Complications You Must Know

Post-surgery complications are the most challenging issues to combat. Inferior Vena Cava filter has been consistently contributing to this problem and patients have filed countless lawsuits to claim compensation for their losses. If you have recently been through surgery and want to know more about the Greenfield filter complications, then read further.

Some of the complications and reported dangers are as follows:

• Blood clots can clog and slow down the blood flow in the lungs

• Perforation or movement of the broken filter in the heart

• Patients can even go through deep vein thrombosis

• The problem of removing the IVC filter

• Erosion or tilting of the medical device

• Swelling or buildup fluid around the heart that interferes with the smooth functioning

These complications also lead to some long-term problems that patients reported. The increased risks included blood clots, IVC blockage, and even wrongful death. After these horrible episodes, the FDA passed a verdict to stop all the distribution of IVC medical devices in the market to curb the risks. However, Greenfield filter complications kept on increasing due to the carelessness of the manufacturers. 

If you have suffered through some of the serious complications as discussed above, then it’s time you take a legal ground. IVC Filter Litigation offers some of the sought-after services to help you file a successful claim. Their skilled lawyers will make sure you get the compensation you deserve. Visit https://ivcfilterlitigation.info/ or dial 1-855-631-1338 to take professional help.

Is Your IVC Filter The Reason For All Your Troubles?

        

The IVC Filter, a spider-like implant, used to block blood clots from moving is known to cause severe complications on some patients. These metallic blood clot filter sideeffects include

·         Persistent pain in the chest

·         Shortness of breath

·         Migration of the implant

·         Perforation of internal organs

The complications can disturb the normal lifestyle of the patient, plus cause loss of payment due to missed job commitments. If you too are a victim of the IVC Filter, then approach IVCFilterLitigation.Info. For more information, visit ivcfilterlitigation.info or call 1(855)631-1338.

Reasons Why Victims Hired IVC Filter Attorneys

Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filter is a medical device that is implanted to prevent blood clots. These are spider-like devices implanted in the IVC, the central vessel returning blood from the bottom half of the body to the heart. These devices serve the purpose to block blood clots from connecting with the lungs or heart thereby avoiding life-threatening emergencies. However, irony is that these devices are known to have their own set of complications demanding for an IVC filter lawyer to fight for the justice of the victims.

Serious injuries caused by IVC Filter:

• Device-Associated Morbidity

• Device Migration

• Recurrent DVT/PE

• Filter Fracture

• Thrombotic Complications

• Insertion-Site Thrombosis

• Perforation Of The Vena Cava

• Filter Embolization

• Vena Cava Thrombosis

Safety warnings alerted by FDA:

• The FDA received more than 6,000 adverse event reports related to inferior vena cava filter side effects.

• In 2005, the Greenfield Vena Cava Filter produced by Boston Scientific was recalled by the FDA, which was terminated in November 2006.

• In 2013, the FDA announced a recall mentioning a labeling correction of a retrievable IVC filter manufactured by Cordis Corporation.

• On May 6, 2014, the FDA recommended the removal of temporary IVC filters within 29-54 days through the release of another Advisory letter.

• In 2015, the FDA sent a warning letter to C.R. Bard Inc. for violations and failure to warn of its IVC filter devices.

Hiring IVC Filter Attorneys:

• Many patients who have experienced serious IVC filter side effects such as perforation have responded by filing lawsuits against manufacturers of their device, alleging that the filters are not worth the risk, and that manufacturers intentionally concealed the seriousness of side effects from consumers and the larger medical community.

• The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports that hundreds of patients have reported vein filter adverse side effects in the last ten years.

• Lawsuits over vein filter adverse side effects allege that device manufacturers have a responsibility to warn consumers and the medical community about the serious risks associated with their filter devices.

• Filing an IVC filter lawsuit cannot repair the damage a patient suffers, but can help compensate for financial losses from medical expenses and lost wages a patient may experience.

If you are one of the victims of damaged IVC filter implant, it’s time to hire a professional IVC filter lawyer to fight for your justice. Contact IVCFilterLitigation on http://ivcfilterlitigation.info/ or call at 1(855)631-1338 for details.

Settlements In Defective IVC Filter

Interior Vena Cava (IVC) filters are small, cage-like medical devices used for the treatment of patients who suffer from pulmonary embolism (PE). Retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters were introduced to help patients from enduring long term complications of permanent filters. Unfortunately, since their introduction in 2000, the blood clot filters have been linked with plenty of severe health complications.

IVC filters can migrate from the implanted position to other parts of the body through the blood stream. If not treated timely, it can lead to retroperitoneal hematoma, sepsis, gastrointestinal bleeding and air embolism. Patients who suffered from these complications claimed for damage awards in ivc filter lawsuit settlements.

The FDA first released a public safety communication in 2010, followed by another in 2014. Both these health alerts warned about further adverse health events associated with long-term IVC filter use. The FDA announced a recall of all Cordis retrievable IVC filters in 2013. In 2015, C.R. Bard came under fire after the FDA did an investigation to find out its defectively designed devices.

The main complications reported in the lawsuits, include but not limited to:

• Filter fracture
• Perforation of the nerve walls or organs
• Embolization
• Blood clot filter migration
• Difficulty removing the filter

 IVC Filter Lawsuit

A panel on multidistrict litigation (MDL) decided that it would be appropriate to consolidate the IVC filter lawsuits and have been done so in courts in Indiana (Cook) and Arizona (C.R. Bard). As the cases go for trial, it is up to the manufacturer to satisfy the safety concerns.

Following are the main points of argument in the ivc filter lawsuit settlements:

• Inbuilt fault in the medical device's design
• Failed to warn the physicians or the patients about the risk associated
• Misleading representation of the product through wrongful advertisement

Patients, who have suffered from the complications of the defective IVC filters, should file for the lawsuit.

Visit http://ivcfilterlitigation.info/ or dial 1 (855) 631-1338 to know more about how they can help filing the lawsuit. Get a free and legal consultation of your case from the experts.